Is it Ever OK to Lie on Your Resume?

It’s a big risk if you lie on your resume. Is it worth it?

Is it a good idea to lie on your resume?Source: Getty Images

From a little white lie to whoppers that will get you fired in an instant, it's apparently common to lie on your resume. Should you do it?

A competitive job market might tempt you to fib a bit about your experience, exaggerate your skills or maybe even concoct a downright lie on your resume about that degree you actually never finished.

Some people change dates to hide a period of unemployment, overstate their sales numbers, embellish their job descriptions or exaggerate their level of responsibility.

Most hiring experts will warn you that lying is a bad idea, particularly now in this era of online research and background checks. It is very likely that outright lies will be discovered, and your reputation and career could be ruined.

What do people lie about?

  • Earning degrees they don't have
  • Not having degrees they think will be viewed as overqualified
  • Continuing education courses
  • Where they've worked, by using companies they never worked for, or just making something up
  • Listing they worked for a household name company that later acquired the company where they worked
  • Fudging on dates, either by just lying outright, or by leaving off months in order to make it look longer
  • Adjusting past job titles to make them higher-level, or to make them lower-level to not be intimidating
  • Language abilities
  • Technical skills
  • Their address, in order to appear local to a job
  • The scope of their job responsibilities, either making them more or less experienced

Is it common to lie on your resume?

A report by Business Insider revealed that 31% of people in their study say they have lied on their resume. (Interestingly, 13% admitted that they lied when answering the question, so I guess there's a margin of error there.)

The book Freakonomics suggests that more than half of people lie on their resume in some way. That's a lot of lies.

Some very high profile people have been caught in resume lies.

MIT's Dean of Admissions Marilee Jones confessed in 2006 that she'd lied about earning three degrees at different prestigious colleges when she was hired in 1979. Despite a long and successful career, she had to resign.

In 2001, at Notre Dame football coach George O'Leary lasted just five days before it was revealed he'd lied about his degree and that he'd never played a game of college ball.

And in the corporate world, now-ex-CEOs from RadioShack, Lotus Corporation and Veritas Software were all outed for falsifying degrees. One also lied about his military record, and said he was an orphan when his parents were actually still alive.

Of course, there is lying and then there is lying.

This is where it can get a little blurry, because of course not all lies are the same.

Some are complete fabrications of facts, like that degree the CEO never bothered to get.

Others are more lies of omission, such as using only years for dates so an employment gap isn't noticed, or leaving off a short-term job that was a failure. These aren't considered lying, though astute interviewers know when to probe for more information.

Never lie about the facts.

Most hiring experts will advise you that outright lying about facts is simply not worth the risk. Confirming college degrees, employment dates, where you've lived in the past and your criminal record are all part of standard background checks.

And, as the MIT admissions director found out, when the lie is about a fact, it doesn't matter how long it's been. It's still a deal breaker.

My advice: never lie on your resume, but tell your most positive version of things.

That doesn't mean you have to reveal every painful tidbit of your past, and with things that are more subjective, you have more leeway to tell the story in your own way.

Tell the truth with a positive spin.

Instead of lying, present the truth with the best possible spin, and don't call attention to things that could be a negative for your job search.

Tell the truth, in the most positive way possible. If there is something negative in your background, focus the silver lining and why it makes you a better candidate.

You don't need to call attention to anything that might be to your detriment in your job search, or offer any information you think will work against you.

If you think that the truth will keep you from getting the job, then maybe it's not the right job for you, or it's time for you to get the kinds of skills and experience to get that job while you work in one that you are qualified for.

And if you're certain that you are qualified, then brainstorm with someone about how you can tell your story without lying. You'll be happier in the long run when you represent yourself truthfully.

More about resumes and sticky situations:

Share Your Thoughts
For your protection, ensure that no personally identifiable information (like full name or email address) is submitted in your comment.

Your Privacy
Trust is a cornerstone of our corporate mission, and the success of our business depends on it. P&G is committed to maintaining your trust by protecting personal information we collect about you, our consumers.
Anonymous | Mar 27, 2012
Well, what do you expect? I believe more people lie than admitted in your survey! When people are so intimidated by today's wacky interviewing processes, and knowing they are being screened as if the job they are applying fpr is for the FBI, people are pushed into a corner and will do whatever it takes to get a job. Let's face it, the majority of people are looking for work for SURVIVAL and not a career! I think hiring techniques should be face-to-face, and the interview should be longer than 10 minutes, and a person's credit rating is (personally) none of a company's business. So, let's see if I've got this right: companies don't want to deal with people (and it is obvious by how they accept resumes), they don't want to be held accountable for the limited time they spend with a person they plan on hiring for their company who will be in their presence for 8-10 hours a day, they want to meet a candidate one time for 10-15 minutes, then they want to blame the person for not getting to know them and giving the appropriate amount time to really get to know us! Sounds like the medical professionals who give us a physical in 15 minutes, and then when a person drops dead of a heart attack a week later and the family sues for negligence - then we're wrong! There are alot of great candidates out there, but you can't judge a person based on an old formula resume or the fact that (in today's job market and bad economy) that someone is out of work for more than . . . say . . . 3 minutes! In that case, NO ONE will be employable in 10 years from now! Whatever happened to hiring someone based on probation - you do a good job and you are hired. You do a great job, and you get a raise! Whatever happened to old-fashioned references. You pick up the phone while the person is there and ask questions. You get a decent review and you hire the person on the spot! Considering the job market, it doesn't take a Ph.D. or a rocket scientist to hire a decent person who has the qualifications OR potential. Whatever happened to on-the-job training! College graduates used to start in the mail room and not hired into management right out of college! Maybe we need to go back to the good old days and stop trying to reinvent the wheel!!
follow us
Subscribe to Newsletters
X
About Life Goes Strong Contributors
Newsletter Sign Up Friends
Newsletter Unsubscribe Contact Us
Mobile App Sitemap